The following is an unedited, stream-of-consciousness personal journal used to experiment with different subjects outside of assignments and to practice free-writing. It shouldn't (at all) be viewed as a portfolio of polished work.

To see examples of my professional writing, please visit ginabegin.contently.com. For photography, please visit eyeem.com/u/ginabegin or my Instagram channel @ginabegin.

Global Warming ... So What?

"...only we humans make waste that nature can't digest." 
Capt. Charles Moore of the Algalita Marine Research Foundation

Well, I got over my writer's block today thanks to a post on another blog I just finished reading. I was just going to leave a short little comment, but it turned into a full tangent, and as Chris Brogan (social media man extraordinaire) once advised:  ...if you've made a good comment, use it as a blog post! (Or something along those lines.)


So now I follow the advice of Brogan and do exactly that.


Ahem. Here I go:


I am a student of earth sciences... it was my major and I have had a lifelong fascination with the earth and all its processes. I do believe firmly that the earth's climates naturally and cyclically shift - obvious, as Earth has had  several ice ages with periods of warming in between.


However, I do believe that man, as a one of the few beings capable of acting upon its environment and not necessarily being acted upon, CAN and does have an effect on the environment and can essentially intensify/speed up a shift in the changing climate. On the flip side, mankind may also be able slow down the process to a degree with human ingenuity. 


We can not deny that certain actions that make the human race comfortable are also detrimental to the environment. A universal law states that every action has an effect. If we are being "unwise" stewards in taking care of the earth, we should expect that likewise there will be a reaction in kind. We should expect to see a degree of degradation in the quality of life on this planet. We can not naively think that we can go about happy-go-lucky with no thought for anything but our own comfort as a species and not reap any repercussions.


Luckily, the earth has been a robust planet, bouncing back or adapting from many of our actions. However, as the human race continues to grow and use more resources, we have started to see some failings in the environmental systems: lakes that have been unable to support its fish; forest systems that have become inundated with exotic (introduced) species; displaced species; extinction. Why is it not possible that our pollution may also be intensifying an already naturally occurring cycle of global warming? The result may have been subtle in natural circumstances (generally speaking, that's how nature works- GENERALLY ;) but with our actions involved, we may be witnessing much more drastic results than would have naturally occurred.




On the flip side, there has been a greater awareness brought to us on the importance of the environment. This has awareness has spurred a reaction of people doing things such as using reusable shopping bags (hopefully slowing the growth of the Great Pacific Garbage Patch- which CAN'T be good for anything living there), driving less (we in Salt Lake City see the effects of too many vehicles on the road every day since we have some of the worst air in the country during the winter), walking/biking more (hey, that's a healthy way to help our nation's obesity problem! ;), using solar panels and better construction tactics such as LEED certified buildings to keep energy use down (and I'd much rather see solar panels than oil drills in my landscape; way less ugly in my opinion- and being a native Floridian, we don't need more oil in the ocean!), and the restoration of many habitats, especially wetlands which are crucial to the longevity of our planet's species (and hey, it looks nice, too).


If the idea of human-caused global warming is what it took to make people realize that we are harming our earth and co-habitants on this earth- which we were and still are doing - and start changing their lifestyle, then I ask what harm is there in that? More biodiversity? Cleaner air? Healthier bodies? Less sickness and disease? All this will come in time with living more respectfully with our surroundings. However, even if there is no human-caused (or even influenced) global warming and we continue with our past actions we have all the opposites - less biodiversity, polluted air, obesity-caused disease, sickness.


I'd rather an "imagined" global warming scare wake us up than business as usual and continued unwise stewardship of my home. Earth is all we've got.

27 comments:

  1. As long as it doesn't infringe on my life, liberty or pursuit of happiness...I'm all for it. Good stuff, Gina!

    ReplyDelete
  2. I disagree with your last statement. Lying only makes it so that when people find out the truth they are less willing to listen to you and others that sound like you.

    Other than that: yes, we do need to make some changes. The plastic garbage in particular is absolutely out of control.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Jeremy-

    I agree with outright lying, but if there is a general belief in something, that is not a lie... it's just a hypothesis/theory until otherwise proven wrong. What I am saying is even if it ends up that there is no global warming, at least we have started to make changes. Even if there is not global warming, we have seen that there IS pollution and environmental degradation- unhealthy for us and for the other living creatures on this earth and the general public is beginning to realize that they have an effect on the overall quality of life. I hope that understanding won't change even if global warming is proven false.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Your blog is spot on! We need to accelerate Algae Bio Fuel production and implementation...!

    Isn't Man Non Indigenous...? So would that make us an introduced species ...?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Interesting topic. My comment isn't necessarily related to global warming, but certainly related to conservation.

    As I entered into my new venture, I wanted to make sure that whatever we were producing wouldn't adversely impact the Biomass. Still doing my homework, but there are so many things that could impact the fisheries. There's no evidence of this, but one of the things I believe could have a serious impact is soft plastics. A lot of the lures/baits out there are made of soft plastic, which are extremely effective at catching fish, but most are not bio degradable, so who knows what kind of effect that will have when they are bit off and digested by the fish. That's why I'm very careful that when I catch a fish with a soft plastic and it's been bit off, I retrieve it before placing the fish back in the water. That's also why, I've chosen to produce products made of heavy duty latex that can't be bit off and swallowed.

    Gotta protect the fisheries, so future generations won't lose out.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Spot on, Gina. I feel the same way. If we accept global warming as true and make the changes to help preserve the environment, and then it turns out to be bogus, haven't we still done some good? Shouldn't we want to protect our planet regardless?

    Good work.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Aleisha Hamilton PaspuelFebruary 24, 2011 at 11:51 AM

    Love it!! People will arbitrarily sit there and argue for years about global warming, when the real issue at hand is us creating a toxic environment for ourselves. Frankly, I blame corporate greed and our society's desire for instant gratification in all its forms for most of the opposition.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I've always thought the whole politicization of global warming is ridiculous, because even if you throw that out the window, there are even more important reasons to use energy wisely, and look to greener things. Like preserving a liveable civilization for our posterity for instance.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Love the post... though im not sure how man is non-indigenous to Earth... unless the aliens DID bring us here, in which case they should be back to get us before we completely screw things up... i mean, right?

    ReplyDelete
  10. Jim,

    Dan's stance is from his religious standing (I asked him to clarify this same thing).

    My answer: So then, yes. We are exotic species in that view! But only by a few "days". ;)

    ReplyDelete
  11. There is no doubt humans make a huge impact on their environment, and the more complacent we are about it, the worse impact we'll have. I do appreciate the positive changes people make when they realize they are creating a larger footprint than is necessary. I don't have an opinion on whether global warming is a hoax or not, as there seems to be some pretty credible science that goes either way on the debate, but I hate it being used as a political bargaining chip, which it most definitely is being used for. Like the first commenter said if it doesn't infringe on my God-given rights I am all for the measure. If it does, ie, cap and trade and all sorts of other menacing legislation, yes, I do have a problem with it. I don't know the solution yet. I don't know how we protect or environment and protect our rights at the same time because the two often seem to be at odds with one another. However, I once met a man running for state senator and also claimed to be a staunch conservative. I asked him how he reconciled the two and he said a real conservative would protect the environment because he'd want to do the most with the resources he was given, he'd want to conserve. When processes produce a lot of waste it shows they are inefficient and therefore not conservative. I tend to agree with him and really like his philosophy. Unfortunately, I don't think many people, on either side of the political aisle really understand or behave in this manner. It's tricky. We can only do our best as individuals.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Sabrina, I thought this would be just the kind of post you'd comment on; in fact, I thought of you as I wrote it and wondered what you'd have to say.

    Interestingly enough, I also thought of my dad, a staunch conservative (NOT a Republican!), who has always said the exact same thing. It makes sense in my mind if you are conservative, you'd be conservative in this area as well, and go back to the root of the word: conserve. I agree with this philosophy 100%. That's the real heart of a true conservative.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Gina-

    Still not totally sure i understand... as in on the first day yada yada heavens and the earth?

    also... i stand by my statement that the aliens will be back, and that we will be able to add our disticntiveness to their own...

    on a completely different note, for those of you who love skiing and boarding, check this blog out... new post about a soundtrack for shredding! (this plug is gina-approved)

    ReplyDelete
  14. Right on about being wise stewards of the earth, walking/biking more, using reusable grocery sacks, using solar panels, etc. I am totally with you that changes need to be made.

    The thing that bothers me about global warming is the political nature of it. There are so many more pressing environmental concerns that I wonder why this one - which is a theory - has taken the lead and left all the others in the dust.

    It is causing some ridiculousness in the world - case in point - the EPA banning a certain type of rescue inhaler for asthmatics because it MIGHT harm the ozone, making the other, less effective, more likely to clog, more expensive type of inhaler the only option as a rescue inhaler. As an asthmatic, I would say, trading people's lives for something that is only a theory is TOO much. And it's all political. And I see no reason for it to have happened unless it was some deal between the EPA and drug companies so that the companies can make more money from asthmatics.

    I think we need to bring other environmental issues to the table alongside global warming - for example - abandoned mines where traces of arsenic are still being leeched into the rivers in Montana.

    Anyway, love your post! People can debate the reality of global warming until they are blue in the face, but I'd rather we stop spending energy debating and start spending energy making changes to help us be better stewards of the earth.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Sarah, I would love to discuss this more but I can't link to a profile through your link... I hope you are staying on top of comments here because I love insightful comments like yours. If you are still around, let us know if you are on twitter or have a blog or some way to catch up with more of your ideas. =)

    Also, totally agree. Human life is first. Not necessarily all our tiny comforts, but our lives <-yes. First and foremost.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Great post! I hope the author of the blog appreciated your comment ;)

    I have to say that most of the comments in here are actually reasonable and intelligent. That is not something one often see's when discussing global warming.

    My faith and my education tell me we should all be good stewards of the environment. Politically, I am one of the "evil" conservatives out there. I am a big fan of Rush Limbaugh, Sarah Palin, and Ayn Rand. I also believe the theory of man-made global warming is simply a theory. Much of the "science" wouldn't survive any real scrutiny in any other scientific field.

    I believe we should encourage each other to conserve, and we should teach our children to protect nature. However, when we start passing laws that drastically impact our lives, our health, and our freedoms, I believe we have gone wrong. When we start forbidding developing nations from achieving the same levels of success we have, I think we should take a real hard look in the mirror.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Thanks, Andy- I hope he did, too ;)

    And conservatives are not evil- the true conservatives (See Sabrina's comment and mine following).

    We have to protect each other and allow other countries success… but I guess it also is a factor of what you deem success? I don’t necessarily think that our consumption rate in the US is proof of success… I think we could all live smaller lives and still be very very happy. In fact, one the nation which measures its national success by happiness is (Bhutan) is also poor compared to our standards. http://video.forbes.com/fvn/lifestyle/bhutan-gross-national-happiness

    Success is not measures by our belongings but by happiness in our life. It is my personal observation that we are happier when the sky is a little cleaner, the water is a little clearer and there are green things growing around us.

    ReplyDelete
  18. You hit the nail on the head in your conclusion, Gina. Stewardship of the earth is something that pious SUV drivers seem to miss.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Honestly as Americans I don't think we've learned much, but I believe we're slowly getting an idea of what we do to contribute to the planet's deterioration, but we've far from "gotten it". Unfortunately, I think it's going to take Americans becoming more self-less before we take a major stand in protecting the earth.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Your dad must be a wise man. There are lots of great insightful thoughts on your post. Good work, Gina, bringing this into discussion today. It's always good to be reminded of our responsibilities to earth and the environment. If this microcosm of people can have a rational discussion about all of this, why can't the community at large be able to come together more on these issues?

    ReplyDelete
  21. Hmmm... that is weird that my profile is not available. Maybe I made it private and forgot that I did so. Either way, I thought I should make myself known... I am the Sarah that met you at the Salt Flats with Maria and the one that does trips to Mexico. There are too many Sarahs in the world so I thought I'd make sure you knew. :-)

    ReplyDelete
  22. Great post. Be the change you want to see. What bad is going to come out of recycling and being more cautious with your choices?

    ReplyDelete
  23. So now that I've read this huge dialogue I don't know if there is much I can add. I consider myself a conservative and an environmentalist. I recently accepted a position with one of the largest mining companies in the world. One of the tenants of the company is to be responsible in mining efforts. I think responsibility is the key to everything you and others have talked about. We must be responsible for our actions, on any level. Companies must be responsible for their actions just like individuals. One of the most difficult obstacles to overcome on this particular subject is the nature of accountability. The ramifications of the decisions made today that directly impact the environment often are unnoticed for many years, sometimes hundreds. It makes measuring and understanding the impacts of our decisions very difficult.
    I would echo the sediment of others in that I can't stand the political posturing that takes place to try to gain grace on this subject but it is inevitable due to the inherently corrupt nature of government.
    I also believe the best way to promote responsible actions are by educating people and organizations on the impacts of their decisions. I don't believe laws are nearly as effective as education. The challenge lies in providing that education and making sure that the message is accurate and consistent. I also am a firm believer in capital systems, so I want to reward companies that I believe are acting responsibly. The best way for us as consumers to encourage responsible companies is to solicit business from companies who are acting responsibly.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Well said my Twitter friend :)

    ReplyDelete
  25. Well said my Twitter friend, I really enjoyed this post. I honestly think I need to meet with engineers/inventors, because I have ideas, but not the technicality to actually make them.
    For example: Solar Powered Air Conditioning for countries like Sudan, & other equator territories that have access to a LOT of sun. Thats just one of the ideas that I've thought of..I think its totally doable, I just don't know HOW to do it :)

    Much Love to you, & have a wonderful weekend.

    ReplyDelete
  26. I certainly could not have said it better myself.
    When I build my garage my hope is to be off the grid with solar panels, chemical toilet with byproduct for fertilizer and a cistern to gather rain water.
    Can’t wait
    Love Dad

    ReplyDelete
  27. So sad people can't properly dispose of their garbage. My guess is that one day there will be a plastic bridge one could walk across from California to Japan.

    ReplyDelete

back arrow more arrow